by Buduwoodoo » Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:55 am
Hey Germanbeemer, why do you bother? Do you simply like to read your drivel?
Porsche's aren't all fast.
I own both a 69 and 97. you have most probably never touched one. But you assert to be an expert. And here you tell him to get an early 911, but in your other answer, you say that older 911's are crappy? Make up your mind and stop leading people astray. In 69, the T had 110hp, the E had 120 and the S had 140 hp. These weren't "fast" cars. Porsche was more worried with handling, and won many races by reaching top speed and maintaining it caused by superior handling, than with speed and accelleration. Do your homework.
AS FOR THE ANSWER
The 87 944, presuming you're talking about a basic model, not the turbo, or the "S", had a hp ranking of 155 bhp. The turbo 1st appeared in 86, The "S" in 87 The base engine has been increased in 1987 over the last 147 hp which was constant from 1983 to 1986. This was done by rising the compression percentage of the engine to 10.2:1
Now the engine is a 2.6 L 2688cc 8cyl, and the car weighs in at just a hair under 3000 pounds. This is pretty heavy when in comparison to the 911s and given the engine size.
Although not a slow car, they're surely not the fastest thing around, either in their time, nor now. Like all engines Ferdinand intended but, they're quite "torquey".
So, for a fun, inexpensive sports car, they are a hoot. At home maintenance is pretty easy. But any big repairs may be expensive.
Any thoughts on to get an early 911? they're lots more fun to drive. A totally different experience with the engine in the rear.
Good luck